Reform or Revenue Grab? The Truth Behind India’s New Sin and Luxury Tax

From the paan stall on the corner to the velvet-lit bars of South Delhi, a quiet shock is coming.

On September 22, India rolled out its GST 2.0. A “simplification,” the government insists: two clean slabs of 5 and 18 percent, and then the guillotine — 40 percent on what it calls “sin and luxury.” Cigarettes, pan masala, gutkha, sugary drinks, liquor, and luxury cars, every indulgence bracketed together, as though a Marlboro, a whisky bottle, and a Porsche were all symptoms of the same national illness.

The moral arithmetic is seductive. Raise the price of bad habits, and people will quit. Fill the state’s coffers at the same time. Health meets revenue, a perfect win-win. Except life is not a budget note. Economists know addictions are famously inelastic. Cigarette sales dip briefly after every hike, then climb back up as users absorb the cost. Alcohol follows the same stubborn curve. What does shrink, inevitably, are the margins of street-side vendors and kirana shops. The man selling beedis outside a factory gate, the bartender running a tiny local bar — these are the people who will feel the knife first.

Government spin calls this reform a Diwali gift: relief on essentials, punishment on vices. But the timing is too convenient to be altruistic. The state has struggled with GST compensation shortfalls, and Karnataka’s chief minister has already pushed for an even higher cess on tobacco and luxury cars to make up for revenue holes. The CBIC itself has floated the possibility of fresh levies beyond the 40 percent bracket. When policymakers talk about health while sharpening their knives for the exchequer, it is hard not to see the mask slip.

Doctors in Bengaluru cheered the move, demanding that beedis, too, be taxed as harshly as cigarettes. Their case is sound: tobacco kills, and fiscal deterrents matter. Yet unless the extra billions are channeled into cessation programs, rural clinics, or awareness campaigns, the rhetoric of “saving lives” rings hollow. Tax hikes without public health investment are theater, punitive gestures dressed up as reform. They may deter the occasional teenager from picking up a smoke, but for hardened users, they merely deepen debt and dependence.

History has seen this play before. America’s Prohibition in the 1920s tried to tax and ban its way into sobriety and instead birthed a golden age of gangsters and bootleggers. Closer home, Gandhi himself railed against liquor shops, but he did not imagine solving the problem with punitive tariffs — his answer was social reform, not fiscal exploitation. Every attempt to engineer morality through price tags has met the same fate: people find ways around the law, and the state ends up chasing shadows.

And then comes the oldest specter: the black market. Every country that has leaned too heavily on sin taxes has seen smuggling thrive. India is no different. Gutkha already moves illegally across state borders when duties diverge. With a flat 40 percent slab, the incentive for underground trade only grows. Enforcement remains weak, and corruption fills the gaps. What begins as a morality play risks ending in a smugglers’ festival.

There is something brutally efficient about collapsing GST into fewer slabs. Ordinary consumers will welcome lower rates on milk powder, fans, even smartphones. But the “40 percent solution” reeks of opportunism. It is not about virtue; it is about survival. A government strapped for cash has chosen the easiest targets: the poor man’s vice and the rich man’s toy. Both can be demonized with equal ease. Both are defenseless at the ballot box.

By September 22, the new rates will bite. Prices will climb, newspapers will carry photos of smokers grumbling outside shops, health officials will claim victory, and the Finance Ministry will quietly tally the windfall. But the deeper question lingers: can a state truly govern by taxation alone? Without reforming public health, without addressing addiction as a social crisis rather than a fiscal opportunity, the answer is no. India’s GST 2.0 will raise money, yes. Whether it raises the country is another matter altogether.

---